home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: acsu.buffalo.edu!rycohen
- From: rycohen@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ross Y Cohen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Msg from Carl Sassenrath (VISCorp)
- Date: 19 Apr 1996 20:59:59 GMT
- Organization: UB
- Message-ID: <4l8usf$2mc@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu>
- References: <jgager-1204962257310001@annex-106.bmi.net> <4l5oes$f05@the-fly.zip.com.au> <4l6b04$ghe@azure.acsu.buffalo.edu> <4l83ac$971@nyheter.chalmers.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: orichalc.acsu.buffalo.edu
- NNTP-Posting-User: rycohen
-
- In article <4l83ac$971@nyheter.chalmers.se>,
- Martin Caspersson <SA9418@IDA.UTB.HB.SE> wrote:
- >rycohen@acsu.buffalo.edu (Ross Y Cohen) wrote:
-
- >>Connecting a computer to a TV was OK in 1982, not now.
-
- >Have you seen an Amiga connected to a TV equipped with a EURO-SCART
- >stanndard connector (This is direct RGB feed to the electron cannons)?
- >The picture quality equals that of the 1084 (at least it did on my TV
- >when I used one (now I have a 1438)). This would be quite useable for
- >Internet, interactive cabletv and such thing, but I doubt it would
- >work for more serious stuff. I don't know if there's something
- >simmilar in the USA thought as the RF connector is nothing to write
- >home about.
-
- Never seen it, but I used to have a 1084 for my 2000. It wouldn't go
- up to 640x480 non-laced, which is no longer acceptable for a
- PC. I agree that this would be ok for some stuff, but not much.
-
- Ross.
-
-